Currently released so far... 4040 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
AR
ASEC
AEMR
AORC
AJ
AMGT
ACOA
AEC
AO
AE
AU
AFIN
AX
AMED
ADCO
AG
AODE
APER
AFFAIRS
AC
AS
AM
AL
ASIG
ABLD
ABUD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
AGMT
ATRN
CO
CH
COUNTER
CDG
CI
CU
CVIS
CIS
CA
CBW
CF
CLINTON
CM
CASC
CMGT
CN
CE
CJAN
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CG
CS
CD
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CV
CAN
ECON
ETTC
ELN
EPET
ENRG
EFIN
EAID
EINV
EG
EWWT
ELAB
EUN
EU
EAIR
ETRD
ECPS
ER
EINT
EIND
EAGR
EMIN
ELTN
EFIS
EI
EN
ES
EC
EXTERNAL
ECIN
EINVETC
ENVR
ENIV
EZ
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ECA
ET
ESA
ENERG
EK
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IC
IR
IS
IAEA
IZ
IT
ITPHUM
IV
IPR
IWC
IQ
IN
IO
ID
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
IIP
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INRB
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
ITALY
ITALIAN
INTERPOL
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
KNNP
KDEM
KIRF
KWMN
KPAL
KPAO
KGHG
KN
KS
KJUS
KDRG
KSCA
KIPR
KHLS
KGIC
KRAD
KCRM
KCOR
KE
KSPR
KG
KZ
KTFN
KISL
KTIA
KHIV
KWBG
KACT
KPRP
KU
KAWC
KOLY
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KV
KMDR
KPKO
KTDB
KMRS
KFRD
KTIP
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KMCA
KGIT
KSTC
KUNR
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KVPR
KOMC
KAWK
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBIO
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KMPI
KHDP
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
KNUC
KPLS
KIRC
KCOM
KDEV
MOPS
MX
MNUC
MEPP
MARR
MTCRE
MK
MTRE
MASS
MU
MCAP
ML
MO
MP
MA
MY
MIL
MDC
MTCR
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MR
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASC
MASSMNUC
MPOS
MZ
MOPPS
MAPP
MG
MCC
OREP
ODIP
OTRA
OVIP
OSCE
OPRC
OAS
OFDP
OIIP
OPIC
OPDC
OEXC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OTR
OVP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
PGOV
PREL
PTER
PINR
PINS
PARM
PHUM
PARMS
PREF
PBTS
PK
PHSA
PROP
PE
PO
PA
PM
PMIL
PL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PGOVE
POLINT
PRAM
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PGOF
SMIG
SNAR
SOCI
SENV
SO
SP
SW
SHUM
SR
SCUL
SY
SA
SF
SZ
SU
SL
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
STEINBERG
SN
SG
UK
UNGA
UP
UNSC
UZ
UN
UY
UE
UNESCO
UAE
UNO
UNEP
UG
US
USTR
UNHCR
UNMIK
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
USUN
USEU
UV
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07REYKJAVIK139, ICELAND: GOVERNING COALITION NEEDS AN ELECTION-EVE MIRACLE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07REYKJAVIK139.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07REYKJAVIK139 | 2007-05-11 17:05 | 2011-01-13 05:05 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Reykjavik |
VZCZCXRO2878
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHRK #0139/01 1311743
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 111743Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3293
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 REYKJAVIK 000139
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV IC
SUBJECT: ICELAND: GOVERNING COALITION NEEDS AN ELECTION-EVE MIRACLE
TO CONTINUE
Refs: A) Reykjavik 127
B) Reykjavik 125
C) Reykjavik 114
¶1. (U) Summary: In the final days before Iceland's May 12
parliamentary elections, highly volatile poll data has shown drastic
changes in party support. The Progressive Party is polling higher
than it has for months, while the Left Greens are losing the
momentum they had been gaining over the past year. The margins are
slim enough that the prospects for the current government's hold on
power vary from poll to poll. Prominent analysts have declared that
voters will essentially be putting the current government's economic
policies on trial. A plurality of voters would prefer to see the
same government on May 13, but popular distaste for the Progressives
stands a good chance of forcing PM Haarde's Independence Party into
coalition with the Social Democratic Alliance. End Summary.
¶2. (U) Gallup started releasing daily polling data on May 7 ahead
of the May 12 elections to the Althingi (parliament). The most
recent results (May 10) were as follows:
Percentage of voters expressing a preference (Gallup):
Independence (IP): 36
Social Democratic Alliance (SDA): 26
Left-Green (LG): 16
Progressive (PP): 14
Liberal (LP): 7
Iceland Movement (IM): 2
Undecided/no preference stated: 11 percent of respondents.
¶3. (U) Compared to Gallup and Frettabladid polling data two weeks
ago (Ref. A), the IP's support is dwindling somewhat, in keeping
with its history of scoring higher in the polls than on Election
Day. The PP is now rising faster than it has for months, polling at
14 percent, having gained about four percent in two weeks.
Historically, the PP, in contrast to the IP, always fares better in
elections than in opinion polls. Support for the Left-Greens, which
peaked several weeks ago, is now measuring 16 percent. This is
consistent with past pre-election indicators, where the LG tends to
steadily lose voter support shortly before elections. The SDA is
now winning back the support that it earlier lost to the Left
Greens, as more and more voters may be realizing that the Left
Greens would be an uneasy partner in a coalition government. In
contrast, voters may be catching on to the idea that the SDA's
center-left policy could be more amenable to the IP, were these two
parties to form a government.
¶4. (U) Both Independence and the Progressives are hoping that
voters' general happiness with their standard of living will
translate into support on election day. A May 7 Frettabladid poll
showed that more than one third of the electorate would like the
current coalition government to stay in power, which is an increase
of eight percent since late April. Other possible coalitions fared
considerably worse: twenty percent of voters prefer a
left-of-center government that would consist of the Social
Democratic Alliance and the Left Green Movement, while about 15
percent favor an IP-SDA government and approximately nine percent
fancy an IP-LG coalition.
¶5. (SBU) Comfort with the current coalition aside, two days away
from the elections, results differed from one poll to the next about
whether the current IP-PP government will lose or maintain its
majority. The most recent Gallup poll shows the current IP-PP
coalition with a slim one-seat majority, but polls by Frettabladid
and Bladid on May 10 and 11 both show the government losing its
majority. Prominent PP members, such as Foreign Minister Valgerdur
Sverrisdottir and Minister of Agriculture Gudni Agustsson, have said
that the party needs greater support in order to be able to stake a
claim to extend its partnership in the current coalition. Agustsson
stated that the party needs to get 17-20 percent for this to happen.
(Comment: This would be an amazing last-minute turnaround, even
for the Progressives.)
¶6. (U) As a result, a number of political observers and pundits now
predict an IP-SDA coalition. They think that in order for Icelandic
politics not to become stagnant a new coalition must take over the
reins. The PP's following has, moreover, dwindled to such an extent
that it would not have a legitimate place in government. The
observers also note that there are not as many ideological
differences between the IP and the SDA as there would be in an
Independence/Left-Greens coalition. An IP-SDA coalition would be a
robust one in parliament and reminiscent of the so-called
Resurrection Government (Vidreisnarstjorn)--that consisted of the IP
and the Social Democratic Party, one of the forerunners to the
SDA--and was in power from 1959-1971. The Resurrection Government
has, in fact, been called one of the two "islands of stability" in
Icelandic politics, the other one being the current IP-PP coalition
that has been in power since 1995.
REYKJAVIK 00000139 002 OF 002
¶7. (SBU) Comment: Voters are not awed by the ongoing election
campaign, which many characterize as lackluster. Environmental
protection has virtually disappeared from the campaign over the last
week continuing the trend since the March 31 Hafnarfjordur
referendum (Ref. A). A lack of disagreement on election issues in
general has enabled the IP and PP to champion the vibrant economy
and the high standard of living, which has been achieved under the
current coalition, without much resistance from the opposition. The
biggest problem for the Independence Party is that voters are tired
of the Progressives, who despite their late run but may not draw
enough support to keep the government in power. Absent a
Progressive miracle, Prime Minister Haarde (Independence) will be
searching for a new coalition partner come May 13. He may find that
the Social Democratic Alliance offers a smaller ideological gap to
bridge than his other potential partners. End Comment.
VAN VOORST